middle-Michigan, mid-July 2016 |
A relatively high proportion of dwellings in this county
seat of 7,000 persons are rental properties; either because building wealth by
owning houses is a favorite route, or because the income base includes lots of
people with too little savings for mortgage down payment or weak credit scores,
or all the above.
The past several weeks this apartment has been a hotspot for
19 or 20 somethings, including a baby or toddler. The comings and goings seem
to be at all hours, with a variety of vehicles parked next to the one car that
seems to be there most consistently. Perhaps the overall laxity of time
schedule also extends to use of space, and control of money and material goods,
too, since visually there seems to be disorder.
And then suddenly all activity
stopped and the “Demand for Non-payment of Rent” form shown here with two
colors of highlighter applied was duct taped to the front door, signed by the
landlord.
During the past many years a dozen or so renters have come
and gone; some with children, others without. Some with pets, others without.
The longest-term residents seemed to keep things visually in order and seemed
to have followed a repeating time schedule. The shortest-term residents did
not.
What does it mean that the scenes here display lack of control
of material things? The litter, loud shouts and profane punctuations were a
source of irksome nuisance to me; but perhaps that reveals more about my
(Middle Class, bourgeois) frame of reference that comes from long years at
college and in white collar work places than it does about the world view for
normal, or at least acceptable, standards of life among the young renters here.
Not all young people show such little concern or control of
time, physical space and materials, credit, currency, or personal reputation.
So perhaps this laxity of boundaries is idiosyncratic rather than historically
true of the present generational cohort, or true of this developmental state,
or true of people less well-educated by formal classroom training.
Whether idiosyncratic or a wider trend, it seems consonant
with other “anywhere, anytime” and mobile communication trends that disregard
the old boundaries that define one’s schedule, method of conducting one’s life,
expectations of self and regarding others. In place of landlines there is the
cell phone. In place of broadcast TV there is view on demand. In place of
sit-down meals at fixed times and places there is take-away or solitary eating.
All of these examples contribute to a sense of fluidity, relativism and
desire-driven decision s instead of ones dictated by circumstances or rules or
propriety or precedent.
For the people who used to live at this location, the
reality of being locked out and being labeled risky tenants is sinking in.
Personally relaxing the old boundaries may work in a world of one’s own making,
but everyone else still has to follow society’s old rules still on the law books.
No comments:
Post a Comment