30 January 2020

Symposium on Worship 2020 at Calvin University, Grand Rapids, Michigan

Near the last days of January every winter since 1997 the people at Calvin College (rechristened University in fall 2019) have hosted a Worship Symposium on campus with a steady registration of 1500, plus or minus, in recent years, equally divided between men and women and a slight preponderance of younger attendees in 2020. The Thursday-Friday-Saturday proceedings begin each morning and end the seminar sessions late each afternoon with public worship in 2 and some years 3 concurrent services. This photo is the opening morning at the Chapel (with room for about 300 seated in the round; or rather, in the hexagonal). The larger venue is the auditorium at the Covenant Fine Arts Center (capacity 1100). [click the image for larger display]
before, during, after worship Thursday 8:30 a.m.
People who present or participate come from many denominations and a wide range of locations around North America and, indeed, from countries around the world. Attendees can choose from a variety of sessions to attend, paying for the full symposium, or just by the day. The worship times, though, are free and open to the public.

As a participant observer there are many notes and experiences to articulate and reflect on, but with these pictures the prompt to write about here is the wonder of gathering people at various stages of spiritual growth; with differing stocks of knowledge, life experience, and aspiration or ambitions that motivate them to walk through the door and sit down. Then as the announced start time nears and the organist begins playing, the quiet conversations dissipate until all attention focuses on the words of the worship leader and the sequence of the Order of Worship goes from start to finish. In the end the blessing is given to release everyone into their day's events and the worship space empties, while here and there small groups of fellow travelers to the symposium exchange thoughts or seek out musicians, preacher, or worship leaders for a brief self-introduction or question/answer interchange.

There are no printed Worship Bulletins or other guidance for what amounts to a room filled with mostly strangers to each other, united in their love of God, the name and the word of God, and their own place in this world. And yet, thanks to text projected onto screens with responsive readings or lyrics (but no music notes for those able to sing in parts), and thanks to the mic'd strong singing voices of worship leaders to set the rhythms and melodies, somehow the assembled people, unfamiliar with the way things will go, still are able to join in the congregational singing, react to the spoken word of scripture and preaching, and make meaning of the course of the worship service.

In the eyes of a watchful spectator, it must seem surprising that so many different people from all corners of the world should appear at the appointed time at this location, join smoothly in the flow of events, including singing in unison or harmonizing ad lib, then fill themselves with meaning and learning, and finally depart onto the campus to engage in the sessions they have chosen. It could well be that those skillful worshipers may never cross paths with others in that moment ever again. And yet how very well did the whole experience bloom and produce meaningful fruit.

Of course, it is not as if such huge productions of praise, learning, reflection, prayer, and participation just happen randomly in times and places where you least expect it. The Calvin University annual Worship Symposium is planned as soon as the previously one wraps up and evaluation comments are studied. And the kick-off morning worship service derives from the designated theme or Bible passage for the year. So the shape, the talent, and the general direction for the morning is given to organizers which builds in some deliberateness. But the part played by those showing up, registered or general public (not registered) is unknown. Still the whole thing comes together somehow. That surely is amazing, whether one is a long-time seeker after God's will or a first-time visitor. The morning was streamed online and can be replayed or browsed at https://livestream.com/calvin-university/events/8972364/videos/201358165

26 January 2020

Culture is... Hall of World Cultures, university museum

4 dimensions of culture: diverse, adaptive, dynamic, symbolic [click photo for larger view]
A quiet Saturday afternoon late in January was a chance to return for a visit to the Michigan State University Museum after several years. Some wide ranging reflections on the presentation of artifacts appears in this blog about museums following this day's brief visit. Part of the permanent exhibition is the Hall of World Cultures, above. Several of the glass cases go beyond the region-specific presentations and address the anthropological uses for the concept of culture. Among trained professionals in scholarly settings or in private sector social analysis the range of meanings for this term is wide, each person emphasizing the facets they know best: culture's integral place in language and thought, culture as extension of physical interface with the Earth's habitats and other creatures and resources there, culture as secondary to political economy, culture as source of meaning, culture as learned and shared and partly flexible but partly conservative and long-lasting, and so on.

In this photo the analytical overview of culture divides into the four facets (displayed from right to left): culture is symbolic, dynamic, adaptive, diverse. Synonyms are many but could restate these four as culture is: meaningful, flexible, reactive to circumstances, and multi-form. The display case illustrates each of the facets with material culture drawn from many different parts of the world to show that the assertion indeed fits all these contrasting examples. Other display cases focus on just one of the facets, such as "culture is adaptive" in the illustration of teapots of China from various locations, materials, and eras.
illustration for "culture is adaptive" [click photo for bigger view]
Perhaps the widest definition that encompasses the four facets in this permanent display, along with many others, is to say that "culture is what gives shape to your life." Much like the philosophers of design who say that "everything around you has a specific shape; many times it was a person or group of people who determined that form." So, too, of culture informing and shaping your thinking, speaking, actions, life plans, daily habits, procedures to solve problems - indeed, the ways to identify what counts as a "problem," all these things stem from the system of meanings and methods inherited, adapted, expressed, and handed down.

As someone who studied anthropology at college and went on to graduate school for more of the same, eventually teaching and writing anthropology, participating in conferences, conversations, and committee work, the idea of culture is like an old family friend. But to see it here in the Hall of World Cultures at first gave the feeling of seeing it with fresh eyes. After all, when you swim in these waters it so easily is taken for granted. But when you are a fish out of the water for a moment, then you see it from a little distance and are granted a moment with which to look at it plainly. In this instance at the MSU Museum, what does it mean to show the visitors that culture is diverse in the many channels and forms it takes; that it is adaptive to circumstances that come and go; that it is dynamic in changing moment by moment as a living thing; and that it is symbolic and carries meanings tied to other themes in the society and land and seasons that comprise the context for living?

The collection of meanings, practices, and organizing themes bequeathed by elders and lived out in the current generations is vast and multifarious: vague perceptions, articulated ideas, verbalized patterns and responses to cues, social relationships and structures of status, technologies that put knowledge and sometimes wisdom into functional physical form, and relationships with landscape and seascape by which livelihoods are made and lifetimes are made meaningful. So each of the four declarations, above, offer separate organizing standpoints to look at the vastness of a single culture or to look comparatively across boundaries and over the span of generations.

Thinking about some possible reactions by visitors to the "culture is..." descriptions, the authoritative language could put the reader into the framework of looking up something in an encyclopedia: it is no-nonsense language, leaves little room for doubt of the meaning, and may bear traces of lecturing to the ear of someone ignorant of the scholarly (technical term and) meaning of 'culture'. Furthermore, unless the reader can somehow see what is being pointed out in the display case or by considering personal experiences with living in the society just outside the museum walls, then the explanations will ring empty; not true or urgent. Hopefully, though, at least a few visitors will embrace some of the meanings being expressed and then go out into the light of day outside the museum and start to notice things about the built landscape, social interactions, the natural landscape and people's livelihoods, the many ways that language is used to create meaning, and the ways that a person's mindset colors the world around them.

In conclusion, seeing the label text and artifacts to illustrate "culture is..." here in the MSU Museum, the directness of the explanation (culture is diverse, dynamic, adaptive, and symbolic) and the physical examples of each concept do effectively express the kinds of things that social scientists mean by 'culture'. But since the lens is turned toward 'exotic' other people or historical societies from which artifacts were obtained, it is probably difficult for many visitors to make the mental leap and look in the mirror (turning the lens around to study one's own ways of doing things) to see culture in personal, interpersonal, and society-scale patterns and relationships. In other words, the display at the museum shines a light on the presence and significance of documenting and understanding the structures of people's culture. But it does not go so far as to operationalize the concept for the visitors to examine their own day-in, day-out experiences using this term. And yet, to demonstrate the importance and insight of culture for understanding others AND equally to understand one's own line of family, community, and ideas is a worthwhile step and unifies one's own familiar society with all those unfamiliar people around the world and the societies of other centuries, too. By putting all ways of life onto an even playing field, the common humanity is expressed: exotic is de-exoticized and familiar is de-familiarized.  Each lived experience has meaning and value.